halfoffdepot.com
 

Most Viewed

Top 6 articles this week:

Write In

In order to use this feature, please sign in or register.



The Sunday Paper Staff Blog

Current Articles | Categories | Search | Syndication

New York Times admits faulty reporting on Palin

In their eagerness to discredit a politician, even reporters at the best of newspapers can accept shady information as fact, without checking adequately on its source. It's a sloppy way to do business, but  in a hurried profession it happens. Maybe it's just because the New York Times is so huge and so widely read that it appears to rack up more big sloppy errors than most.  A mispelling here and there, the occasional wrong date on an event, etc, these are to be expected at any newspaper, but the Times, in an odd turnabout, does pretty well on the little things and outrageously badly on some of the big things. Take for example the paper's most recent error in covering GOP vice presidential pick. Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin. This was published in today's Times:

Alaskan Independence Party officials released a statement Monday saying that Ms. Palin had been a member for two years, from 1994 to 1996, information included in reports in The New York Times and other news outlets. In Internet videos of recent party meetings, other party officials can be seen boasting of Ms. Palin’s past membership.

On Tuesday, though, the party’s chairwoman, Lynette Clark, said the earlier statement was false. Ms. Clark said that she had based it on information another party member had given her, but that a review of the records showed only that Ms. Palin had attended the 1994 conference.

Ms. Clark added that while the review confirmed Todd Palin as a member, it did not indicate that Ms. Palin had been one.

On Wednesday, Ms. Clark released a corrected statement, saying, in part, “I, foolishly, repeated and accepted as fact what an officer of this membership shared with myself, and husband Dexter Clark, over a year ago.”

“I humbly apologize to Governor Palin, and to both national and local press and media,” she added.

Ms. Palin has been registered as a Republican since May 1982, according to the State Division of Elections. Mr. Palin registered as a member of the Alaskan Independence Party in 1995, remaining a member for all but two months of the next seven years, until he registered as an undeclared voter in July 2002. 

Oopsies.

Obviously, the AIP has reason to claim a popular high-profile politician as their own. Just think about how many groups have tried to claim Obama as their own. Given that obvious motive, the Times should have been much more careful and instead of just taking a party official's word for it, the Times reporter should have had  Ms. Clark fax over a copy of Gov. Palin's registration card or form.

Incidentally, I found this on the Alaskan Independence Party Web site, on the introduction page:

"The platform of the AIP is, as one would expect, centered on Alaskan issues. Although it is widely thought to be a secessionist movement, the Party makes great effort to emphasize that its primary goal is merely a vote on secession, something that Party advocates say Alaskans were denied during the founding of the state. A plebiscite was, in fact, held in Alaska at the state's inception in 1958, but AIP members argue that voting was corrupt and that residents were not given the proper choice between statehood, commonwealth status, or complete separation -- something they say has been granted to other U.S. territories such as Puerto Rico. " http://www.akip.org/introduction.html

by Stephanie Ramage | Friday, September 05, 2008 at 10:30 AM in Opinion | Comments (3) | Permalink

COMMENTS

Commentby John | Friday, September 05, 2008, 11:35 PM

No wonder advertisers and readers are fleeing! The drive-by media taking its marching orders from the DailyKos and CodePink. Many US Americans are evaluated by their employer as to their accomplishments during the year versus their stated goals. Obama has no accomplishments in 2008, 2007, 2006, and few if any in 2004-5. Let's see if the drive-bys can determine his accomplishments of the years he worked for ACORN nd go back and interview people in Hyde Park and his associates like Prof. Bill Ayers. The drive-by media has no problem doing a drive by and then looping back to giggle at the damage and mayhem, the ruin of a family. The NY Times has endured several crisis in the past 6 months: John McCain lobbyist story; John Edwards non-story; treatment of Sara Palin and family; kid-glove treatment to the likes of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and Obama. One-by-one, they snap the ties of the readers, advertisers and NY Times investors.  

Commentby Paul | Saturday, September 06, 2008, 4:55 PM

"No accomplishments" is a harsh thing to say about another human being. Not sure what an "accomplishment" is to you, but if BO hasn't had any in the last 4 years, I wonder how worthless does that make the rest of us?  

Commentby Harris | Monday, September 08, 2008, 10:54 AM

I always enjoy watching Right Wingers string Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and Obama together as John does in the post above. Of course, you are NOT being a Racist, you are just alleging that these 3 Black Men All share "kid-glove treatment" by the Times? They just coincidentally happen to be Black?

The implication is, of course, that Obama is just like Jackson and Sharpton. After all, he's Black and they are both well-known Black Men who just happen to have been painted as charlatans suckling off the public teat for their money. So, by implication and your direct statement, Obama must also, like them, have accomplished nothing in life?

I see this propaganda tactice all the time and find it more annoying than interesting. Just so you know, I can concede to you entirely the point that the 2 "Reverends" don't deserve too much respect - having made their careers race baiting and allegedly "working for charitable causes" - while denouncing completely the intended link to Obama.

Obama earned his money the old-fashioned highly ethical way - writing 2 high-volume selling books.

His reported $4 million in income is directly traceable to the success of his books in fair competition in the marketplace.

Your linking of the three men is, therefore, specious at best, intentionally deceptive race-baiting propaganda at worst.

Next time you pen a sentence stating that "the likes of..." then only include 3 Black Men, I advise you to throw in at least 2 White Men as well.

That way, you and your argument can achieve a perfect...3/5 Compromise.  

You must be logged in to post a comment. You can log in here.

 
Advertisement
Sharp Residential Banner Block
Half Off Depot
Advertisement
Zifty